5/25/2010 - The INQUIRY was America's first Central Intelligence Agency. Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, and Woodrow Wilson's close political advisor and friend, Edward Mandel House, suggested the idea to Wilson. House became the INQUIRY's first director, Walter Lippmann was House's first recruit. The existence of the INQUIRY such a well kept secret, that to this day hardly any Americans have heard of the INQUIRY or are aware that it ever existed. Wilson paid for the INQUIRY from the President's Fund for National Safety and Defense. He directed that it not be housed in Washington. A remote room in the New York Public Library was its first office. Later it moved to offices in the American Geographical Society at West 155th Street and Broadway. James T. Shotwell, a Columbia University historian and an early recruit came up with the agency name the INQUIRY, which, he said, would be a "blind to the general public, but would serve to identify it among the initiated." Shotwell probably chose the name because the word History is derived from the Greek word meaning "a learning by inquiry." Ironically the INQUIRY would use psychological warfare techniques to warp history by stressing favorable and unfavorable truths and leaving out facts completely to shape public opinion to support INQUIRY goals.
 
 The INQUIRY and its members wrote most of Woodrow Wilson's 14 points. Many of the members of the INQUIRY and the US State department delegates at the Paris Peace conference belonged to the American branch of a secret society founded by the English imperialist Cecil Rhodes. At the Paris Peace conference they traded off most of the 14 points to establish the League of Nations. After the conference they attended a meeting at the Hotel Majestic and become the founding fathers of the Council on Foreign Relations.

 Council on Foreign Relations member  Edward M. House became the first National Security Advisor. The National Security Advisor serves as the chief adviser to the President of the United States on national security issues. This person serves on the National Security Council within the Executive Office of the President. The National Security Advisor's office is located in the West Wing of the White House. He or she is supported by a staff that produces research, briefings, and
intelligence for the NSA to review and present to the National Security Council and the President of the United States.
 
 The National Security Advisor is appointed by the President without confirmation by the United States Senate. This is meant to make sure they are not connected to the bureaucracies of the Departments of State and Defense, and are therefore able to offer independent advice. Every National Secuirty Advisor since CFR member House has been a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. The current office holder is retired Marine Corps General James L. Jones, who assumed the duties of the post when Barack Obama was sworn into office on January 20, 2009 as President of the United States. General James L. Jones is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
 
 On September 12, 1939, the Council on Foreign Relations began to take control of the Department of State. On that day Hamilton Fish Armstrong, Editor of Foreign Affairs, and Walter H. Mallory, Executive Director of the Council on Foreign
Relations, paid a visit to the State Department. The Council proposed forming groups of experts to proceed with research in the general areas of Security, Armament, Economic, Political, and Territorial problems. The State Department
accepted the proposal. The project (1939-1945) was called Council on Foreign Relations War and Peace Studies. Hamilton Fish Armstrong was Executive director.

 In February 1941 the CFR officially became part of the State Department. The Department of State established the Division of Special Research. It was organized just like the Council on Foreign Relations War and Peace Studies project. It was divided into Economic, Political, Territorial, and Security Sections. The Research Secretaries serving with the Council groups were hired by the State Department to work in the new division. These men also were permitted to continue serving as Research Secretaries to their respective Council groups. Leo Pasvolsky was appointed Director of Research.
 
 The State Department has been controlled by Council on Foreign Relations members since its inception. The NSA and State Department are closely connected through Council on Foreign Relations membership.
 
 [Council on Foreign Relations member ]Gen. David Petraeus, commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East and Central Asia, says he endorses [Council on Foreign Relations member ] Gen. Stanley McChrystal's strategy in Afghanistan.
 
 The Afghan assessment is contained in a confidential report prepared by the commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, a copy of which was obtained by The Washington Post. The thrust of McChrystal's assessment is that without more troops by next year the eight-year-old conflict could result in failure.
 
 Speaking at a conference of military and civilian counterinsurgency experts, [Council on Foreign Relations member ] Petraeus said the current multi-dimensional approach is the only way to fight terrorism in Afghanistan, the Voice of America reported. He said Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen also has endorsed [Council on Foreign Relations member ] McChrystal's assessment, the report said.
 
 "To counter terrorism, and I'm talking about terrorism writ large, extremism, requires more than just your special mission unit forces," [Council on Foreign Relations member ] Petraeus said. "It really requires a whole of governments,
counterinsurgency approach. Many different government agencies, civil-military partnerships and, again, a comprehensive approach to these problems is the answer."
 
 The report quoted Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell as saying [Council on Foreign Relations member ] McChrystal's troop request will be sent to Defenses [Council on Foreign Relations member ] Secretary Robert Gates this week, while a review by President Barack Obama and his administration officials continues. Morrell said there may be changes in the troop buildup if Obama decides to adjust his strategy.
 
 Today Mark Mazzetti published an article titled U.S. Is Said to Expand Secret Actions in Mideast in the NY Times. The article should be titled Council on Foreign Relations Expands Secret Actions in Mideast.

The article follows updated to identify CFR members mentioned in the article.

 
  May 24, 2010: U.S. Is Said to Expand Secret Actions in Mideast
 
 WASHINGTON � The top American commander in the Middle East has ordered a broad expansion of clandestine military activity in an effort to disrupt militant groups or counter threats in Iran, Saudi Arabia, Somalia and other countries in the
region, according to defense officials and military documents.
 
 The secret directive, signed in September by [ Council on Foreign Relations member ]Gen. David H. Petraeus, authorizes the sending of American Special Operations troops to both friendly and hostile nations in the Middle East, Central Asia and
the Horn of Africa to gather intelligence and build ties with local forces. Officials said the order also permits reconnaissance that could pave the way for possible military strikes in Iran if tensions over its nuclear ambitions escalate.
 
 While the Bush administration had approved some clandestine military activities far from designated war zones, the new order is intended to make such efforts more systematic and long term, officials said. Its goals are to build networks that
could �penetrate, disrupt, defeat or destroy� Al Qaeda and other militant groups, as well as to �prepare the environment� for future attacks by American or local military forces, the document said. The order, however, does not appear to
authorize offensive strikes in any specific countries.
 
 In broadening its secret activities, the United States military has also sought in recent years to break its dependence on the Central Intelligence Agency and other spy agencies for information in countries without a significant American troop
presence.
 
 [ Council on Foreign Relations member ] General Petraeus�s order is meant for small teams of American troops to fill intelligence gaps about terror organizations and other threats in the Middle East and beyond, especially emerging groups plotting attacks against the United States.
 
 But some Pentagon officials worry that the expanded role carries risks. The authorized activities could strain relationships with friendly governments like Saudi Arabia or Yemen � which might allow the operations but be loath to acknowledge their cooperation � or incite the anger of hostile nations like Iran and Syria. Many in the military are also concerned that as American troops assume roles far from traditional combat, they would be at risk of being treated as spies if captured and denied the Geneva Convention protections afforded military detainees.
 
 The precise operations that the directive authorizes are unclear, and what the military has done to follow through on the order is uncertain. The document, a copy of which was viewed by The New York Times, provides few details about continuing missions or intelligence-gathering operations.
 
 Several government officials who described the impetus for the order would speak only on condition of anonymity because the document is classified. Spokesmen for the White House and the Pentagon declined to comment for this article. The Times, responding to concerns about troop safety raised by an official at United States Central Command, the military headquarters run by [ Council on Foreign Relations member ] General Petraeus, withheld some details about how troops could be deployed in certain countries.
 
 The seven-page directive appears to authorize specific operations in Iran, most likely to gather intelligence about the country�s nuclear program or identify dissident groups that might be useful for a future military offensive. The Obama
administration insists that for the moment, it is committed to penalizing Iran for its nuclear activities only with diplomatic and economic sanctions. Nevertheless, the Pentagon has to draw up detailed war plans to be prepared in advance, in the
event that President Obama ever authorizes a strike.
 
 �The Defense Department can�t be caught flat-footed,� said one Pentagon official with knowledge of [ Council on Foreign Relations member ]General Petraeus�s order. The directive, the Joint Unconventional Warfare Task Force Execute Order, signed Sept. 30, may also have helped lay a foundation for the surge of American military activity in Yemen that began three months later.
 
 Special Operations troops began working with Yemen�s military to try to dismantle Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, an affiliate of Osama bin Laden�s terror network based in Yemen. The Pentagon has also carried out missile strikes from Navy ships into suspected militant hideouts and plans to spend more than $155 million equipping Yemeni troops with armored vehicles, helicopters and small arms.
 
 Officials said that many top commanders, [ Council on Foreign Relations member ] General Petraeus among them, have advocated an expansive interpretation of the military�s role around the world, arguing that troops need to operate beyond Iraq and Afghanistan to better fight militant groups.
 
 The order, which an official said was drafted in close coordination with Adm. Eric T. Olson, the officer in charge of the United States Special Operations Command, calls for clandestine activities that �cannot or will not be accomplished� by
conventional military operations or �interagency activities,� a reference to American spy agencies.
 
 While the C.I.A. and the Pentagon have often been at odds over expansion of clandestine military activity, most recently over intelligence gathering by Pentagon contractors in Pakistan and Afghanistan, there does not appear to have
been a significant dispute over the September order.
 
 A spokesman for the C.I.A. declined to confirm the existence of [ Council on Foreign Relations member ] General Petraeus�s order, but said that the spy agency and the Pentagon had a �close relationship� and generally coordinate operations in the field. �There�s more than enough work to go around,� said the spokesman, Paul Gimigliano. �The real key is coordination. That typically works well, and if problems arise, they get settled.�

 During the Bush administration, [ Council on Foreign Relations & Bilderberg member ] Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld endorsed clandestine military operations, arguing that Special Operations troops could be as effective as traditional spies, if not more so.

 Unlike covert actions undertaken by the C.I.A., such clandestine activity does not require the president�s approval or regular reports to Congress, although Pentagon officials have said that any significant ventures are cleared through the National Security Council. Special Operations troops have already been sent into a number of countries to carry out reconnaissance missions, including operations to gather intelligence about airstrips and bridges.
 
 Some of , [ Council on Foreign Relations & Bilderberg member ] Mr. Rumsfeld�s initiatives were controversial, and met with resistance by some at the State Department and C.I.A. who saw the troops as a backdoor attempt by the Pentagon to
assert influence outside of war zones. In 2004, one of the first groups sent overseas was pulled out of Paraguay after killing a pistol-waving robber who had attacked them as they stepped out of a taxi.
 
 A Pentagon order that year gave the military authority for offensive strikes in more than a dozen countries, and Special Operations troops carried them out in Syria, Pakistan and Somalia.
 
 In contrast, [ Council on Foreign Relations member ] General Petraeus�s September order is focused on intelligence gathering � by American troops, foreign business people, academics or others � to identify militants and provide �persistent
situational awareness,� while forging ties to local indigenous groups.

Prophecy & Biotechnology -- 1
Prophecy & Biotechnology -- 2
Prophecy & Biotechnology -- 3
Prophecy & Biotechnology -- 4
Prophecy & Biotechnology -- 5
Prophecy & Biotechnology -- 6

Source: Activist Post 8/04/2010 Big Brother has turned monitoring the Internet into big business, which grows daily as the controllers wave the false flag of cybersecurity.  Since the magnitude of the "Top Secret" Intelligence Industrial Complex has now been published by the elitist mouthpiece, The Washington Post, it seems there is no stopping the Internet control machine from eliminating all privacy and anonymity on the Web. Facebook made it clear they were participating in the eradication of privacy when this week they published the private data of 100 million members.  But it's not good enough just to have the data available if the government needs it with a court order; rather, they want to map everything in order to predict behavior "just in case a crime may be committed" in the future.  It is the open announcement of a Minority Report-style systemthat is set to work inside and outside of The Cyber World. The Internet now appears to be enfolding into a tyrannical high-tech control grid.  After all, the powerful monopolistic cartels that control every industry, every government, and the media, must feel thoroughly threatened by the Internet -- which, in its current form, represents the ultimate "free market" of free minds where all the people can voice their uniqueness. According to Wired, Google has partnered with the CIA to fund intricate tracking of the Internet:   The company is called Recorded Future, and it scours tens of thousands of websites, blogs and Twitter accounts to find the relationships between people, organizations, actions and incidents � both preesent and still-to-come. In a white paper, the company says its temporal analytics engine “ goes beyond search” by “looking at the ‘invisible links’ between documents that talk about the same, or related, entities and events.”   Besides the now public merger between Google and the CIA, there is a privately-held, little-known company called The Hive Group, specializing in "decoding the Internet's raw data," which seems to be at the heart of a philosophical high-tech system that seeks to track, trace, and database our every move. The Hive Group was founded by the creator of hyperlink technology, Ben Shneiderman, a computer scientist specializing in human-computer interaction.  According to their site they offer, "information treemappingsolutions to both industry and government."  Their primary commercial product, Honeycomb, is listed as a tool for Armed Services, International Governance and Security, and Intelligence described as:   The company builds Highly Immersive Visual Environments that are deployed in operational intelligence (OI), business intelligence (BI), and complex event processing (CEP) contexts.  The company’s treemapping software is the foundation of these visual environments.   Shortly after September 11th, Hive Group founder Dr. Shneiderman testified in Congressional hearings about national identification systems and Biometric ID cards on behalf of the U.S. Public Policy Committee of the Association for Computing Machinery (USACM), which is an 80,000-member strong international professional society, where he said:   Implementing an intricate national identification system is a challenging systems engineering matter. It requires a complex integration of social and technical systems, including humans, hardware, software, networks, and database security. Such socio-technical systems are always vulnerable to error, breakdown, sabotage and destruction by natural events or by people with malicious intentions.   In a 2002 book, Human Choice and Computers: Issues of Choice and Quality of Life in the Information Society, when referring to Biometric ID cards or other National Identification Schemes (NIDS) possibly having prevented the September 11th attacks, the authors quote Shneiderman's testitomy, "The positive identification of individuals does not equate to trustworthiness or lack of criminal intent." In other words, Big Brother has a lot of work to do on predictive behavior technology to keep us safe from the terrorists. Let's now remember that this testimony took place nearly 9 years ago with many billions since spent on the Intelligence Industrial Complex. The Hive Group is one of the companies spearheading the bridge between government and the private sector, having done work for the Defense Department, Lockheed Martin, andSAIC, and even mapped the spread of the bogus H1N1 outbreak "pandemic." In a rare article (press release) in The Washington Post about the privately-held company, titled " The Next Frontier: Decoding the Internet's Raw Data," Schneiderman is quoted as saying:   Our belief is that technology is not just useful as toys or for business, we're talking about using these technologies for national priorities.    Although the majority of HIVE's commercial applications seem somewhat benign, the "national priorities" he refers to lean more toward tyrannical control than actual cybersecurity. The company also has a nefarious connotation with its acronym HIVE and its key product Honeycomb.  Both concepts are derived from Transhumanism -- the philosophy to culturally self-direct evolution and facilitate the human-computer bond into a scientific dictatorship modeled after the central direction of the beehive colony in nature.  It should be no surprise, then, that The Hive Group offers a world population application, since Julian Huxley -- the father of Transhumanism -- was instrumental in the philosophy and policies of population management and reduction. We are heading toward an age where mind and machine are one and the same.  For the advocates of freedom, it is a true blessing to be able to congregate and disseminate the message of peace and prosperity.  However, under the authoritarian rule of the control-oriented HIVE philosophy -- where man is no better, nor different, than bees in a honeycomb -- we have been reduced to be workers at the service of the queen.

 

  "So thou, O son of man, I have set thee a watchman unto the house of Israel; therefore thou shalt hear the word at my mouth, and warn them from me.  When I say unto the wicked, O wicked man, thou shalt surely die; if thou dost not speak to warn the wicked from his way, that wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand. Nevertheless, if thou warn the wicked of his way to turn from it; if he do not turn from his way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered thy soul."  Ezekiel 33:6-9. 

                              "What have we got that we have not received but יְהוָה receives the glory"